Guava Price Analysis

Prices, arrivals and market activity over the last 6 reporting days.

₹5,077
Average modal: ₹12,500
Highest modal: ₹800
Lowest modal: -
Total arrivals: 212
Markets reporting

Modal price trend

Full history

Line: modal price. Shaded band: daily minimum–maximum spread.Hover or use arrow keys to read a specific day.

District averages (latest reporting day)

Thanjavur₹8,0002 mkts
The Nilgiris₹7,5001 mkt
Pudukkottai₹7,5001 mkt
Thiruchirappalli₹7,2005 mkts
Thirunelveli₹7,0002 mkts
Perambalur₹6,5001 mkt
Ranipet₹6,5002 mkts
Namakkal₹6,1705 mkts
Pune₹6,0001 mkt
Kallakuruchi₹6,0002 mkts
Chattrapati Sambhajinagar₹6,0001 mkt
Chengalpattu₹5,9173 mkts

Arrivals over the period

No arrival volumes reported for this period.

Most active markets

No arrival volumes were reported for this period.

Ranked by total arrivals, the volume actually traded, not the price quoted.

Recent momentum

Rising+14.15%

Day-on-day moves in this period

5 up · 0 down across 5 day-on-day comparisons

Markets on latest day: 116
Reading strength: Good coverage

Backed by many reporting markets over several days.

This describes how Guava prices have already moved. BajarBhav does not forecast prices, and this is not a prediction or a recommendation to buy, hold or sell.

What the data shows

Average modal price rose from ₹4,745 to ₹5,417 over 6 reporting days.
Thanjavur recorded the highest district average at ₹8,000.
The gap between the highest and lowest reporting district was ₹2,083.

Statements of what the data records. They do not attribute a cause, a price move can have many, and the price series alone cannot tell them apart.

Go deeper

Full price history →Compare markets and net return →

AdvertisementReach farmers and traders checking today’s mandi priceAdvertise here →

What does this analysis cover?

Figures cover 6 reporting days up to 30 Aug 2026, averaged across every market reporting Guava. Records flagged during validation are excluded. This page reports what has already happened. It does not forecast prices and should not be used as a prediction.