Paddy(Basmati) Price Analysis

Prices, arrivals and market activity over the last 14 reporting days.

₹3,500
Average modal: ₹4,714
Highest modal: ₹1,740
Lowest modal: -
Total arrivals: 101
Markets reporting

Modal price trend

Full history

Line: modal price. Shaded band: daily minimum–maximum spread.Hover or use arrow keys to read a specific day.

District averages (latest reporting day)

Panipat₹4,1681 mkt
Amritsar₹4,1501 mkt
Faridkot₹4,1001 mkt
Tarntaran₹4,0501 mkt
Sangrur₹4,0151 mkt
Pillibhit₹4,0001 mkt
Gautam Budh Nagar₹3,7703 mkts
Hathras₹3,7163 mkts
Bulandshahar₹3,7047 mkts
Aligarh₹3,6943 mkts
Ghaziabad₹3,6503 mkts
Jalaun (Orai)₹3,6471 mkt

Arrivals over the period

No arrival volumes reported for this period.

Most active markets

No arrival volumes were reported for this period.

Ranked by total arrivals, the volume actually traded, not the price quoted.

Recent momentum

Falling-8.76%

Day-on-day moves in this period

5 up · 8 down across 13 day-on-day comparisons

Markets on latest day: 63
Reading strength: Good coverage

Backed by many reporting markets over several days.

This describes how Paddy(Basmati) prices have already moved. BajarBhav does not forecast prices, and this is not a prediction or a recommendation to buy, hold or sell.

What the data shows

Average modal price fell from ₹3,742 to ₹3,414 over 14 reporting days.
Panipat recorded the highest district average at ₹4,168.
The gap between the highest and lowest reporting district was ₹521.

Statements of what the data records. They do not attribute a cause, a price move can have many, and the price series alone cannot tell them apart.

Go deeper

Full price history →Compare markets and net return →

AdvertisementReach farmers and traders checking today’s mandi priceAdvertise here →

What does this analysis cover?

Figures cover 14 reporting days up to 14 Oct 2026, averaged across every market reporting Paddy(Basmati). Records flagged during validation are excluded. This page reports what has already happened. It does not forecast prices and should not be used as a prediction.